Getting Transfer Pricing Adjustments Right Isn’t Just About Tax

Reproduced with permission. Published 10.5.26

Author Bios:

Ami Goldenstein is the founder of TP Right. He is a transfer pricing and international tax professional with over 25 years of experience, dedicated to optimizing global transfer pricing and tax strategies that drive efficiency, compliance, and risk mitigation. He has deep expertise in operational transfer pricing, audits and controversy, intercompany financial transactions, valuations, and intercompany agreements, leveraging data-driven insights to develop innovative solutions that support multinational organizations.

Frank Wang is an advisor/consultant for TP Right. He is a transfer pricing professional with 15 years of experience across both consulting and in-house leadership roles, advising multinational companies on global transfer pricing strategy, controversy and dispute resolution, operational transfer pricing, business restructurings, and intangible property planning and valuation, with significant experience working with executive leadership, legal counsel, and tax authorities on complex cross-border transfer pricing matters.

Summary: Transfer pricing adjustments or “true-ups” can create operational implications extending well beyond tax. A practical framework for considering the timing, implementation, and cross-functional impacts of different adjustment approaches can help multinational companies manage the process more effectively.

Article:

Transfer pricing policies are often designed using benchmarks, target margins, or arm’s-length ranges established annually. In practice, actual results may deviate from intended outcomes throughout the year due to changes in revenue, product mix, costs, foreign exchange rates, and other business conditions.

Transfer pricing adjustments, or “true-ups,” are therefore an important component of operational transfer pricing. While the concept may appear straightforward - adjust intercompany pricing so actual results align with the transfer pricing policy - the operational execution can be considerably more complex.

Timing of TP Adjustments

The first decision is how frequently transfer pricing results should be monitored and adjusted. Depending on the organization, true-ups may be performed monthly, quarterly, semi-annually, annually, or ad hoc.

Although more frequent monitoring can identify deviations earlier and allow smaller periodic adjustments, many multinationals rely on year-end adjustments using a mix of actual results and forecasts to align the tested entity or transaction with the transfer pricing policy. 

Although administratively simpler, year-end adjustments can create challenges. For example, a delayed adjustment beyond the accounting close becomes an out-of-period adjustment. The timing and frequency of true-ups should therefore reflect not only tax considerations but also the company’s financial close calendar, data availability, materiality thresholds, and accounting processes.

Approaches for Implementing Adjustments

Three common approaches on how adjustments are implemented are discussed below.

Approach #1: One-time adjustments

A one-time adjustment is intended to align statutory results with the transfer pricing policy without modifying the underlying intercompany prices in the ERP system. It is generally made for tax purposes, often through a credit or debit note, without changing the underlying transfer prices. While operationally straightforward, companies should consider whether underlying transfer prices should also be adjusted in the system to reflect arm’s-length pricing and whether the one-time adjustment creates inconsistencies among tax returns, statutory accounts, intercompany records, custom declaration values, or other reporting.

Approach #2: Go-forward pricing adjustments

A second approach is to modify transfer prices prospectively. If actual results on a year-to-date basis are below or above the targeted outcome, transfer prices for the remaining transactions of the year can be changed to move results toward the targeted outcome.

Although this approach avoids revisiting year-to-date transactions, its impact may be delayed or insufficient to achieve the intended full-year result, and further transfer pricing adjustments may still be required. A change in inventory pricing, for example, may not immediately affect the income statement. Depending on inventory turnover and the accounting method (e.g., FIFO or LIFO), the revised transfer price may remain in inventory before flowing through cost of goods sold. Similarly, for services, a prospective change to a cost-plus markup may be insufficient to achieve the targeted full-year result if a significant portion of the services has already been performed and charged.

Companies should therefore consider both how revised pricing flows through their accounting systems and whether sufficient transactions remain for the remainder of the year to achieve the intended result.

Approach #3: Retrospective pricing adjustments

A third and less common approach is to adjust transfer prices retrospectively, modifying transactions that occurred earlier in the year. The revised transfer price may also be applied prospectively for the remainder of the year, effectively resetting the year-to-date position and establishing pricing going forward.

This may provide a more direct mechanism for achieving the intended full-year transfer pricing result, but it can also have broader implications. For tangible goods, retrospective changes to import prices may affect customs values and duties and require adjustments to previously filed customs declarations. For services, year-to-date charges may need to be recalculated using a revised cost base, allocation key, or markup, potentially requiring credit notes, supplemental invoices, or intercompany balance adjustments.

Accordingly, retrospective adjustments may provide greater control over full-year transfer pricing results, but can require additional coordination across accounting, customs, invoicing, and other compliance processes.

A Cross-Functional Process

The most important takeaway is that a transfer pricing adjustment or true-up should not be treated solely as a tax exercise.

Before implementing an adjustment, the tax function should consider how the proposed approach interacts with the broader organization. Relevant stakeholders may include finance and accounting, controllership, FP&A, legal, trade and customs, and commercial teams. Their considerations can include financial reporting, cash repatriation, intercompany settlements, customs declarations, intercompany agreements, and customer arrangements.

An effective operational transfer pricing framework therefore establishes clear procedures around when results are monitored, what thresholds trigger an adjustment, how adjustments are calculated and implemented, who must approve them, and how they are recorded.

Ultimately, successful transfer pricing adjustments require more than getting the calculation right. They require getting the timing, accounting, systems, and cross-functional execution right. When those elements are coordinated, true-ups become part of a controlled operational process rather than a rushed year-end exercise.

 | Page